Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28240291›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Residual Effects of THC via Novel Measures of Brain Perfusion and Metabolism in a Large Group of Chronic Cannabis Users.

Francesca M Filbey, Sina Aslan, Hanzhang Lu, Shin-Lei Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bidirectional Effect of Long-Term ΔACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Quantitative assessment of cerebral venous blood TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesca M FilbeyCenter for BrainHealth, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sina AslanCenter for BrainHealth, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hanzhang LuDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shin-Lei PengDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Normalized functional MRI in human brain disordersR01MH084021 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LU, HANZHANG · 2008 to 2017
$3.6M
Genetic and Environmental Modulators of the Brain's Response to Marijuana CuesR01DA030344 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FILBEY, FRANCESCA · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030344NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the known vascular effects of cannabis, this study examined the neurophysiological factors that may affect studies of brain activity in cannabis users. We conducted a systematic evaluation in 72 h abstinent, chronic cannabis users (N=74) and nonusing controls (N=101) to determine the association between prolonged cannabis use and the following neurophysiological indicators: (1) global and regional resting cerebral blood flow (CBF), (2) oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), and (3) cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO

Indexed as

AdultBrainCannabisCerebrovascular CirculationDronabinolFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarijuana AbuseYoung AdultDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID28240291
PMCPMC5809805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.