ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2017
Influence of Additive Manufactured Scaffold Architecture on the Distribution of Surface Strains and Fluid Flow Shear Stresses and Expected Osteochondral Cell Differentiation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Cell Differentiation in Mechanically Stimulated Biphasic Osteochondral Scaffolds Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Numerical study of the structural design influence on cartilage cell differentiation in mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffolds using an FSI-based model.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Architecture mechanics mediated osteogenic progression in bone regeneration of artificial scaffolds.Science advances · 2025Article
- Early stage prediction of bone regeneration using FEA and cell differentiation algorithms with 3D-printed PLA and PCL scaffolds: modeling and application to dorsal double-plating in distal radius fractures.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- A Combined Computational and Experimental Analysis of PLA and PCL Hybrid Nanocomposites 3D Printed Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Effect of Uniaxial Compression Frequency on Osteogenic Cell Responses in Dynamic 3D Cultures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Simulating the mechanical stimulation of cells on a porous hydrogel scaffold using an FSI model to predict cell differentiation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Review
- Bone physiological microenvironment and healing mechanism: Basis for future bone-tissue engineering scaffolds.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Tissue Engineering Strategies to Increase Osteochondral Regeneration of Stem Cells; a Close Look at Different Modalities.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Finite element study of stem cells under fluid flow for mechanoregulation toward osteochondral cells.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Porous Geometry Guided Micro-mechanical Environment Within Scaffolds for Cell Mechanobiology Study in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- A multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate the micro-fluidic environment within a tissue engineering scaffold with highly irregular pore geometry.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2019Article
- Recent advances in bioreactors for cell-based therapies.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Direct Writing Electrospinning of Scaffolds with Multidimensional Fiber Architecture for Hierarchical Tissue Engineering.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2017Article
- Recent Advances in Tissue Engineering Strategies for the Treatment of Joint Damage.Current rheumatology reports · 2017Review
- The Use of Finite Element Analyses to Design and Fabricate Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Skeletal Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scaffolds for regenerative medicine applications should instruct cells with the appropriate signals, including biophysical stimuli such as stress and strain, to form the desired tissue. Apart from that, scaffolds, especially for load-bearing applications, should be capable of providing mechanical stability. Since both scaffold strength and stress-strain distributions throughout the scaffold depend on the scaffold's internal architecture, it is important to understand how changes in architecture influence these parameters. In this study, four scaffold designs with different architectures were produced using additive manufacturing. The designs varied in fiber orientation, while fiber diameter, spacing, and layer height remained constant. Based on micro-CT (μCT) scans, finite element models (FEMs) were derived for finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). FEA of scaffold compression was validated using μCT scan data of compressed scaffolds. Results of the FEA and CFD showed a significant impact of scaffold architecture on fluid shear stress and mechanical strain distribution. The average fluid shear stress ranged from 3.6 mPa for a 0/90 architecture to 6.8 mPa for a 0/90 offset architecture, and the surface shear strain from 0.0096 for a 0/90 offset architecture to 0.0214 for a 0/90 architecture. This subsequently resulted in variations of the predicted cell differentiation stimulus values on the scaffold surface. Fluid shear stress was mainly influenced by pore shape and size, while mechanical strain distribution depended mainly on the presence or absence of supportive columns in the scaffold architecture. Together, these results corroborate that scaffold architecture can be exploited to design scaffolds with regions that guide specific tissue development under compression and perfusion. In conjunction with optimization of stimulation regimes during bioreactor cultures, scaffold architecture optimization can be used to improve scaffold design for tissue engineering purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.