Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28239545›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

New rapid, accurate T

Timothy M Shepherd, Ivan I Kirov, Erik Charlson, Mary Bruno, James Babb, Daniel K Sodickson, Noam Ben-Eliezer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dependence of brain-tissue RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DeepEMC-TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correcting for imaging gradients-related bias of TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Post-Run TCartilage · 2021
    Article
  13. Fast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy M ShepherdDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York, NY, United States.
Ivan I KirovDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York, NY, United States.
Erik CharlsonDepartment of Neurology & Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Mary BrunoDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
James BabbDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel K SodicksonDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York, NY, United States.
Noam Ben-EliezerDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York, NY, United States.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Riccardo Lattanzi · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Quantitative Sodium MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy in Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS097494 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KIROV, IVAN IVANOV, MADELIN, GUILLAUME · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
New region-specific targeted MRI to characterize Alzheimer's disease pathologyK23AG048622 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHEPHERD, TIMOTHY MICHAEL · 2014 to 2018
$818k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048622NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuantitative T

methodsThe EMC algorithm uses Bloch simulations to model T

resultsCompared to conventional exponential T

conclusionsThe EMC algorithm precisely characterizes T

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveBrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAUC, area under the curveB1 +,  transmit fieldBiomarkersDemyelinationEMC, echo modulation curveFLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recoveryGM, gray matterMesoscopicMPRAGE, magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echoMSE, multi-spin echoMWF, myelin water fractionNeurodegenerationRelaxationROI, Region of InterestRRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosisSPACE, sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutionSSE, single spin echoWM, white matter

Identifiers

PMID28239545
PMCPMC5318543
OpenAlexW2585233587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.