Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28239285›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2016

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus S-1 for the treatment of BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to TACE.

Wu-Kui Huang, Shu-Fa Yang, Li-Na You, Mo Liu, Deng-Yao Liu, Peng Gu, Xi-Wen Fan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy ofDigestive diseases and sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Radioembolization treatment for liver metastases.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wu-Kui HuangDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China; These authors contributed equally to this work.
Shu-Fa YangDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China; These authors contributed equally to this work.
Li-Na YouDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China; These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mo LiuDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Deng-Yao LiuDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Peng GuDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xi-Wen FanDepartment of Intervention Radiology, the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo assess the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus S-1 for the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage B HCC refractory to TACE. MATERIAL AND

methods26 patients meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled. TACE was given on day 1, and S-1 on days 2-15. Tumor assessment was performed one month later according to mRECIST. The primary endpoints were TTP and OS.

resultsTwenty-six patients received 176 TACE interventions in all. Fifteen patients of TACE plus S-1 received a total of 55 cycles of treatment of S-1, with a median of 4 cycles (range, 2-6). The total dose of S-1 was 6165 mg per day, while average was 120 mg (range, 100-125 mg) for 15 patients of TACE plus S-1. Median TTP and OS of TACE plus S-1 were 6 months (95% CI: 4.7-7.3) and 18 months (95% CI: 15.3-24.7), respectively, while TACE monotherapy was 4 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.6) and 13 months (95% CI: 9.8-16.2), respectively, and significant differences were detected. Though there were higher DCRs in patients of TACE plus S-1, no significant differences were detected. A total of 612 adverse events occurred during the course of the treatment, 367 in TACE plus S-1 and 245 in TACE mono-therapy. There were significant differences to anorexia and nausea, but they were tolerable.

conclusionsTACE plus S-1 in the present analysis was tolerable and associated with an interesting TTP and OS. TACE plus S-1 may be used as a new treatment method to BCLC Stage B HCC refractory to TACE.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaS-1transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation

Identifiers

PMID28239285
PMCPMC5320460
OpenAlexW2587791627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.