Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28239161›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2017

Adolescent preferences and reactions to language about body weight.

R M Puhl, M S Himmelstein, S C Armstrong, E Kingsford

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Weight Bias and Stigma: Impact on Health.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Weight stigma and its impact on paediatric care.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2019
    Review
  9. Parents' concerns regarding the growth characteristics of their adolescents: a qualitative inquiry in Iran.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R M PuhlDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, and Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.
M S HimmelsteinRudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.
S C ArmstrongDepartment of Pediatrics and Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
E KingsfordWellspring Camps, Melbourne, FL, USA.
University of Connecticut · USDuke University · USWellspring Biosciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 30% of youth and adolescents have overweight or obesity, and health care providers are increasingly discussing weight-based health with these patients. Stigmatizing language in provider-patient communication about obesity is well documented and could be particularly detrimental to youth and adolescents. Although some research has examined preferences for weight-based terminology among adults, no studies have addressed these issues in youth populations. This study represents a preliminary and systematic investigation of weight-based language preferences among adolescents with overweight and obesity enrolled in a summer weight loss camp. Participants (N=50) indicated preferences for weight-based language and emotional responses to words that their family members used in reference to their body weight. Weight neutral terminology ('weight', 'body mass index') were most preferred, although some differences in word preferences emerged by the participants' gender. Boys preferred having their weight described as 'overweight' and 'heavy', while girls preferred the word 'curvy'. A large proportion of participants, particularly girls, reported experiencing sadness, shame, and embarrassment if parents used certain words to describe their body weight, which highlights the importance of considering the emotional impact of weight-based terminology. Providers may consider asking youth and adolescents for their preferences when discussing weight-based health.

Indexed as

Body WeightLanguageAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorBody ImageBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleParentsPatient PreferencePediatric ObesityPhysician-Patient RelationsSelf ConceptStereotypingTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28239161
OpenAlexW2594762032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.