ArticleChronic respiratory disease2017
Managing respiratory disease.
Article in Chronic respiratory disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonpharmacological interventions for managing infections in chronic respiratory diseases: a comprehensive overview.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Prescription rights for psychologists - exploring professionals' perspective in Poland.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nonpharmacological management of psychological distress in people with COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Review
- The complexity of mental health care for people with COPD: a qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Management of respiratory complications and rehabilitation in individuals with muscular dystrophies: 1st Consensus Conference report from UILDM - Italian Muscular Dystrophy Association (Milan, January 25-26, 2019).Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2021Article
- Assessment of Stress, Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Patients with COPD during In-Hospital Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An Observational Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Observational
- It's hard to talk about breathlessness: a unique insight from respiratory trainees .Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2019Article
- New insights to improve treatment adherence in asthma and COPD.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Reflections on integrated care from those working in and leading integrated respiratory teams.London journal of primary care · 2018Article
- Integration of psychological care into a nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) program in the Southeastern United States: A retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
- Exploring perceptions and expectations of COPD patients: A grounded theory approach for personalized therapeutic interventions.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diverse and evolving role of a psychologist within a respiratory multidisciplinary team (MDT) is described, providing a working model for service provision. The rationale for appointing a psychologist within a respiratory MDT is presented first, citing relevant policy and research and outlining the wider psychosocial impact of respiratory disease. This is followed by an insight into the psychologist's role by highlighting important areas, including key therapy themes and the challenge of patient engagement. The way in which the psychologist supports the collective aims and aspirations of respiratory colleagues to provide a more holistic package of care is illustrated throughout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.