Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28238170›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2017

Multiple approaches to assess the safety of artisanal marine food in a tropical estuary.

A C Padovan, M J Neave, N C Munksgaard, K S Gibb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Norovirus GII and astrovirus in shellfish from a mangrove region in Cananéia, Brazil: molecular detection and characterization.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A C PadovanResearch Institute of the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0810, Australia. anna.padovan@cdu.edu.au.
M J NeaveCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Vic, 3220, Australia.
N C MunksgaardResearch Institute of the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0810, Australia.
K S GibbResearch Institute of the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0810, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, metal and metalloid concentrations and pathogens were measured in shellfish at different locations in a tropical estuary, including sites impacted by sewage and industry. Oyster, mangrove snails and mud snails did not exceed Australian and New Zealand Food Standards maximum levels for copper, lead or estimated inorganic arsenic at any site although copper concentrations in oysters and mud snails exceeded generally expected levels at some locations. Bacterial community composition in shellfish was species-specific regardless of location and different to the surrounding water and sediment. In the snails Telescopium telescopium, Terebralia palustris and Nerita balteata, some bacterial taxa differed between sites, but not in Saccostrea cucullata oysters. The abundance of potential human pathogens was very low and pathogen abundance or diversity was not associated with site classification, i.e. sewage impact, industry impact and reference.

Indexed as

AnimalsArsenicAustraliaCopperEnvironmental MonitoringEstuariesHumansMetalsNew ZealandOstreidaeSewageShellfishWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicCopperMetalsSewageWater Pollutants, ChemicalArtisanalMarineMetalsMolluscsPathogens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.