ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2017
A new method for real-time evaluation of pepsin digestion of paraffin-embedded tissue sections, prior to fluorescence in situ hybridisation.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visualisation of gene expression within the context of tissues using an X-ray computed tomography-based multimodal approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Upregulation of long noncoding RNA PVT1 predicts unfavorable prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique, which is regularly applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of a variety of cancers to assess chromosomal aberrations. However, high-quality FISH requires optimal enzymatic digestion, and insufficient digestion is not noted until the hybridisation signals are evaluated in the fluorescence microscope. As a consequence, FISH results may be unreliable, and the experiment might have to be repeated. To solve this problem, we developed a new method for real-time evaluation of enzymatic tissue digestion. Termination of enzyme activity at the proper time facilitates successful hybridisation, and experiments do not have to be repeated. We first performed FISH on 20 FFPE samples, which had been pepsin digested for different times, and this revealed distinct morphological changes within the nucleus and perinuclear space that were detectable by light microscopy. These observations suggested that the presence of intact and clear bare nuclei, surrounded by a translucent perinuclear space, might serve as an indicator of adequate digestion. We developed a protocol for assessment of this indicator, based on morphological features, and applied this to a collection of 400 tissue samples, partly of breast cancer and partly of different types of lymphoma, prior to FISH. The FISH success rate was 99.5% (398/400), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional method. In all successful cases, morphological signs of adequate digestion were paralleled by easily interpretable FISH signals. This new method for the real-time assessment of digestion quality improved the success rate of FISH and in addition was simple and rapid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.