Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28238032›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Information Seeking and Satisfaction with Information Sources Among Spouses of Men with Newly Diagnosed Local-Stage Prostate Cancer.

Aasthaa Bansal, Lisel M Koepl, Catherine R Fedorenko, Chunyu Li, Judith Lee Smith, Ingrid J Hall, David F Penson, Scott D Ramsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aasthaa BansalFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Lisel M KoeplFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Catherine R FedorenkoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Chunyu LiDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Chamblee, GA, 30341, USA.
Judith Lee SmithDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Chamblee, GA, 30341, USA.
Ingrid J HallDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Chamblee, GA, 30341, USA.
David F PensonVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Scott D RamseyFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. sramsey@fhcrc.org.

Funding

Health Promotion Research CenterU48DP000050 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARRIS, JEFFREY R. · 2004 to 2008
$8.4M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information sources about prostate cancer treatment and outcomes are typically designed for patients. Little is known about the availability and utility of information for partners. The objectives of our study were to evaluate information sources used by partners to understand prostate cancer management options, their perceived usefulness, and the relationship between sources used and satisfaction with treatment experience. A longitudinal survey of female partners of men newly diagnosed with local-stage prostate cancer was conducted in three different geographic regions. Partners and associated patients were surveyed at baseline (after patient diagnosis but prior to receiving therapy) and at 12 months following diagnosis. Information sources included provider, literature, friends or family members, Internet websites, books, traditional media, and support groups. Utility of an information source was defined as whether the partner would recommend it to caregivers of other patients with local-stage prostate cancer. Our study cohort included 179 partner-patient pairs. At diagnosis, partners consulted an average of 4.6 information sources. Non-Hispanic white partners were more likely than others to use friends and family as an information source (OR = 2.44, 95% CI (1.04, 5.56)). More educated partners were less likely to use support groups (OR = 0.31, 95% CI (0.14, 0.71)). At 12-month follow-up, partners were less likely to recommend books (OR = 0.23, 95% CI (0.11, 0.49)) compared to baseline. Partners consulted a large number of information sources in researching treatment options for local-stage prostate cancer and the types of sources accessed varied by race/ethnicity and educational attainment. Additional resources to promote selection of high-quality non-provider information sources are warranted to enable partners to better aid patients in their treatment decision-making process.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInformation Seeking BehaviorPersonal SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCohort StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsSpousesSurveys and QuestionnairesInformation sourcesPartner information needsProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28238032
PMCPMC5738274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.