ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2017
Value Assessment at the Point of Care: Incorporating Patient Values throughout Care Delivery and a Draft Taxonomy of Patient Values.
Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Operationalizing patient-centered cancer care: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature on cancer patients' needs, values, and preferences.Psycho-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Understanding the Influence of PrEP Motivations and Concerns on PrEP Use Among Pregnant Women in Lilongwe, Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a general practitioner-based rehabilitation follow-up consultation to promote patients' use of medical rehabilitation aftercare: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trial.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Self-reported patient experiences in a peer-support community: What do cancer patients value?Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Primary care patient interests in joining a planned multi-cancer early detection clinical trial.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Tools and Strategies to Integrate Multi-Domain Information for Personalized Decision-Making in Oncological Care Pathways: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- A Foundation for Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: Key Learnings from Past and Existing Approaches.The patient · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making to Improve Health-Related Outcomes for Adults with Stroke Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Determinants of drug expenditure in the Swiss healthcare market in 2006.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Patient values in healthcare decision making among diverse older adults.Patient education and counseling · 2022Article
- When and why US primary care providers do and do not refer their patients with new-onset seizures or existing epilepsy or seizure disorders to neurologists-2018 DocStyles.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Making community voices heard in a research-health service alliance, the evolving role of the Community Advisory Group: a case study from the members' perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Article
- What Matters to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis When Facing Medical or Non-Medical Treatment Decisions?Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Stakeholder-Engaged Derivation of Patient-Informed Value Elements.The patient · 2020Article
- Incorporating the Environmental Impact into a Budget Impact Analysis: The Example of Adopting RESPIMATApplied health economics and health policy · 2020Article
- A Budget Impact Model to Estimate the Environmental Impact of Adopting RESPIMATAdvances in therapy · 2019Article
- Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Incorporation of patient values is a key element of patient-centered care, but consistent incorporation of patient values at the point of care is lacking. Shared decision making encourages incorporation of patient values in decision making, but associated tools often lack guidance on value assessment. In addition, focusing on patient values relating only to specific decisions misses an opportunity for a more holistic approach to value assessment that could impact other aspects of clinical encounters, including health care planning, communication, and stakeholder involvement. In this commentary, we propose a taxonomy of values underlying patient decision making and provide examples of how these impact provision of health care. The taxonomy describes four categories of patient values: global, decisional, situational, and external. Global values are personal values impacting decision making at a universal level and can include value traits and life priorities. Decisional values are the values traditionally conceptualized in decision making, including considerations such as efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, convenience, and cost. Situational values are values tied to a specific moment in time that modify patients' existing global and decisional values. Finally, discussion of external values acknowledges that many patients consider values other than their own when making decisions. Recognizing the breadth of values impacting patient decision making has implications for both overall health care delivery and shared decision making because value assessments focusing only on decisional values may miss important patient considerations. This draft taxonomy highlights different values impacting decision making and facilitates a more complete value assessment at the point of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.