ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2017
Dose Estimation in Pediatric Nuclear Medicine.
Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biokinetics Study of Tc-99m DMSA for Dose Reduction in Pediatric Molecular Imaging
Biokinetics Study for Tc-99m MDP for Dose Reduction in Pediatric Molecular Imaging
Biokinetics Study for Tc-99m MAG3 Dose Reduction in Pediatric Molecular Imaging
Biokinetics Study for F-18 FDG for Dose Reduction in Pediatric Molecular Imaging
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalised Dosimetry in Nuclear Medicine: Bridging Physics, Biology and AI for Next Generation Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Assessment of reducedAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Quantifying and Contextualizing Radiation Doses in Common Pediatric Medical Imaging Examinations.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Pathways and challenges in the clinical translational of radiopharmaceuticals for pediatric investigations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Booster administration of Tc-99m PMT for delayed static imaging in patients with biliary atresia.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Girth-based administered activity for pediatricMedical physics · 2024Article
- Use of ionizing radiation in a Norwegian cohort of children with congenital heart disease: imaging frequency and radiation dose for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) study.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatricEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- RenalEJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- [Clinical features of neurogenic bladder with vesicoureteral reflux in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021Article
- Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Examinations and Subsequent Risk of Neoplasm: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Investigating Low-Dose Image Quality in Whole-Body PediatricJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Article
- Gonad dose assessment in paediatric kidney nuclear medicine test using Monte Carlo simulation.Journal of radiation research · 2020Article
- In children with urinary tract infection reduced kidney length and vesicoureteric reflux predict abnormal DMSA scan.Pediatric research · 2020Article
- Current pediatric administered activity guidelines forMedical physics · 2019Article
- An Australian local diagnostic reference level for paediatric whole-bodyThe British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Re-evaluation of pediatricPhysics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The practice of nuclear medicine in children is well established for imaging practically all physiologic systems but particularly in the fields of oncology, neurology, urology, and orthopedics. Pediatric nuclear medicine yields images of physiologic and molecular processes that can provide essential diagnostic information to the clinician. However, nuclear medicine involves the administration of radiopharmaceuticals that expose the patient to ionizing radiation and children are thought to be at a higher risk for adverse effects from radiation exposure than adults. Therefore it may be considered prudent to take extra care to optimize the radiation dose associated with pediatric nuclear medicine. This requires a solid understanding of the dosimetry associated with the administration of radiopharmaceuticals in children. Models for estimating the internal radiation dose from radiopharmaceuticals have been developed by the Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and other groups. But to use these models accurately in children, better pharmacokinetic data for the radiopharmaceuticals and anatomical models specifically for children need to be developed. The use of CT in the context of hybrid imaging has also increased significantly in the past 15 years, and thus CT dosimetry as it applies to children needs to be better understood. The concept of effective dose has been used to compare different practices involving radiation on a dosimetric level, but this approach may not be appropriate when applied to a population of children of different ages as the radiosensitivity weights utilized in the calculation of effective dose are not specific to children and may vary as a function of age on an organ-by-organ bias. As these gaps in knowledge of dosimetry and radiation risk as they apply to children are filled, more accurate models can be developed that allow for better approaches to dose optimization. In turn, this will lead to an overall improvement in the practice of pediatric nuclear medicine by providing excellent diagnostic image quality at the lowest radiation dose possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.