Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28236648›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017

Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates.

Mohan Pammi, Angela Flores, James Versalovic, Mariska Mg Leeflang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pathogenic characterization and drug resistance of neonatal sepsis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Review
  11. Trends in incidence of neonatal late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants: a 15-year Brazilian single center analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Bacteria and host: what does this mean for sepsis bottleneck?World journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Group BAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohan PammiSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621, Fannin, MC.WT 6-104, Houston, Texas, USA, 77030.
Angela FloresPediatrix Medical Group - NW Houston Practice, 9250 Pinecroft St., The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 77380.
James VersalovicPathology, Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mariska Mg LeeflangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1100 DE.
Baylor College of Medicine · USAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobial cultures for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis have low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advances in molecular microbiology have fostered new molecular assays that are rapid and may improve neonatal outcomes.

objectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of various molecular methods for the diagnosis of culture-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis in neonates and to explore heterogeneity among studies by analyzing subgroups classified by gestational age and type of sepsis onset and compare molecular tests with one another. SEARCH

methodsWe performed the systematic review as recommended by the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. On 19 January 2016, we searched electronic bibliographic databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed (from 1966), Embase (from 1982), and CINAHL (from 1982)), conference proceedings of the Pediatric Academic Societies annual conference (from 1990), clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Platform (ICTRP) Search portal), and Science Citation Index. We contacted experts in the field for studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that were prospective or retrospective, cohort or cross-sectional design, which evaluated molecular assays (index test) in neonates with suspected sepsis (participants) in comparison with microbial cultures (reference standard). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the methodologic quality of the studies and extracted data. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models and entered data into Review Manager 5. MAIN

resultsThirty-five studies were eligible for inclusion and the summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.95) and of specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) (moderate quality evidence). We explored heterogeneity by subgroup analyses of type of test, gestational age, type of sepsis onset, and prevalence of sepsis and we did not find sufficient explanations for the heterogeneity (moderate to very low quality evidence). Sensitivity analyses by including studies that analyzed blood samples and by good methodology revealed similar results (moderate quality evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsMolecular assays have the advantage of producing rapid results and may perform well as 'add-on' tests.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA, FungalHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePolymerase Chain ReactionSepsisDNA, BacterialDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID28236648
PMCPMC6464551
OpenAlexW2222679311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.