Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28236285›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2017

Cardiovascular Effects of Stimulant and Non-Stimulant Medication for Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trials of Methylphenidate, Amphetamines and Atomoxetine.

Leonie Hennissen, Mireille J Bakker, Tobias Banaschewski, Sara Carucci, David Coghill, Marina Danckaerts, Ralf W Dittmann, Chris Hollis, Hanna Kovshoff, Suzanne McCarthy and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Leonie HennissenDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience (204), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 9100 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-9820
Mireille J BakkerDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience (204), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 9100 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tobias BanaschewskiPaediatric Psychopharmacology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Sara CarucciChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari and "A. Cao" Microcitemico Paediatric Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
David CoghillDivision of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Marina DanckaertsChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Ralf W DittmannPaediatric Psychopharmacology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Chris HollisDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Hanna KovshoffDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Suzanne McCarthySchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Peter NagyVadaskert Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Edmund Sonuga-BarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Ian C K WongResearch Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1 N 1AX, UK.
Alessandro ZuddasChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari and "A. Cao" Microcitemico Paediatric Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Eric RosenthalDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Jan K BuitelaarDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience (204), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 9100 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jan.Buitelaar@radboudumc.nl.
ADDUCE consortium
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Southampton · GBKU Leuven · BEMedway School of Pharmacy · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Nottingham · GBVadaskert Alapítvány a Gyermekek Lelki Egészségéért · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are treated with stimulant and non-stimulant medication. ADHD medication may be associated with cardiovascular effects. It is important to identify whether mean group effects translate into clinically relevant increases for some individual patients, and/or increase the risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events such as stroke or sudden death.

objectivesTo evaluate potential cardiovascular effects of these treatments, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of methylphenidate (MPH), amphetamines (AMP), and atomoxetine (ATX) on diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP, SBP) and heart rate (HR) in children and adolescents with ADHD.

methodsWe conducted systematic searches in electronic databases (PsychINFO, EMBASE and Medline) to identify published trials which involved individuals who were (i) diagnosed with ADHD and were aged between 0-18 years; (ii) treated with MPH, AMP or ATX and (iii) had their DBP and SBP and/or HR measured at baseline (pre) and the endpoint (post) of the study treatment. Studies with an open-label design or a double-blind randomised control design of any duration were included. Statistical analysis involved calculating differences between pre- and post-treatment measurements for the various cardiovascular parameters divided by the pooled standard deviation. Further, we assessed the percentage of clinically relevant increased BP or HR, or documented arrhythmias.

resultsEighteen clinical trials met the inclusion criteria (10 for MPH, 5 for AMP, and 7 for ATX) with data from 5837 participants (80.7% boys) and average duration of 28.7 weeks (range 4-96 weeks). All three medications were associated with a small, but statistically significant pre-post increase of SBP (MPH: standard mean difference [SMD] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.42, p < 0.01; AMP: SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.15, p < 0.01; ATX: SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, p = 0.01). MPH did not have a pre-post effect on DBP and HR. AMP treatment was associated with a small but statistically significant pre-post increase of DBP (SMD 0.16, CI 0.03-0.29, p = 0.02), as was ATX treatment (SMD 0.22, CI 0.10-0.34, p < 0.01). AMP and ATX were associated with a small to medium statistically significant pre-post increase of HR (AMP: SMD 0.37, CI 0.13-0.60, p < 0.01; ATX: SMD 0.43, CI 0.26-0.60, p < 0.01). The head-to-head comparison of the three medications did not reveal significant differences. Sensitivity analyses revealed that AMP studies of <18 weeks reported higher effect sizes on DBP compared with longer duration studies (F(1) = 19.55, p = 0.05). Further, MPH studies published before 2007 reported higher effect sizes on SBP than studies after 2007 (F(1) = 5.346, p = 0.05). There was no effect of the following moderators: type of medication, doses, sample size, age, gender, type of ADHD, comorbidity or dropout rate. Participants on medication reported 737 (12.6%) other cardiovascular effects. Notably, 2% of patients discontinued their medication treatment due to any cardiovascular effect. However, in the majority of patients, the cardiovascular effects resolved spontaneously, medication doses were changed or the effects were not considered clinically relevant. There were no statistically significant differences between the medication treatments in terms of the severity of cardiovascular effects.

conclusionsStatistically significant pre-post increases of SBP, DBP and HR were associated with AMP and ATX treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD, while MPH treatment had a statistically significant effect only on SBP in these patients. These increases may be clinically significant for a significant minority of individuals that experience larger increases. Since increased BP and HR in general are considered risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality during adult life, paediatric patients using ADHD medication should be monitored closely and regularly for HR and BP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmphetaminesAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBlood PressureCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicHeart RateHumansInfantMethylphenidatePsychotropic DrugsAmphetaminesAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidatePsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID28236285
PMCPMC5336546
OpenAlexW2590743000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.