Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28236258›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2017

Intensive care medicine in 2050: precision medicine.

Hector R Wong

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The times are changing: A primer on novel clinical trial designs and endpoints in critical care research.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical practice of sepsis-induced immunosuppression: Current immunotherapy and future options.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Subphenotypes in acute kidney injury: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  18. Precision medicine in trauma: a transformational frontier in patient care, education, and research.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hector R WongDivision of Critical Care Medicine, MLC 2005, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. hector.wong@cchmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-1173

Funding

Novel diagnostic and stratification tools for septic shockR01GM108025 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Stratification of pediatric septic shockR01GM099773 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099773NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Critical CareForecastingHumansMolecular MedicineNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineRespiratory Distress SyndromeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28236258
PMCPMC5568998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.