Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28236159›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

An Examination of Care Practices of Pregnant Women Incarcerated in Jail Facilities in the United States.

C M Kelsey, Nickole Medel, Carson Mullins, Danielle Dallaire, Catherine Forestell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Needs of Incarcerated Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Literature.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hospital Restrictions Experienced by Women who Give Birth While Incarcerated.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2024
    Article
  10. Access to Services for Pregnant People With Opioid Use Disorder in Jails in the United States.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Health Effects of Policing in Hospitals: a Narrative Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023
    Review
  13. "Women & criminal justice · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C M KelseyUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Nickole MedelDepartment of Psychology, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA.
Carson MullinsDepartment of Psychology, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA.
Danielle DallaireDepartment of Psychology, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA. Dhdall@wm.edu.
Catherine ForestellDepartment of Psychology, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA.
William & Mary · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe number of incarcerated women in the United States has been steadily increasing over the last 30 years. An estimated 6-10% of these women are pregnant at intake. Previous studies on the health needs and care of pregnant incarcerated women have focused mainly on prison settings. Therefore, we examined the pregnancy-related accommodations and health care provided for regional jail populations.

methodThe present study is a quantitative survey (administered through phone or email to employees of predominately jail medical facilities) of common practices and policies employed across 53 jail facilities in the United States as a function of geographic region (North vs. South; West vs. Central vs. East). We examined provision of pregnancy screening, special diets, and drug rehabilitation and prohibition of shackling.

resultsStrikingly, across all aspects of the care of pregnant incarcerated women there are areas to be improved upon. Notably, only 37.7% of facilities pregnancy test all women upon entry, 45.7% put opioid addicted women through withdrawal protocol, and 56.7% of facilities use restraints on women hours after having a baby.

conclusionIn this first study to examine practices in regional jails nationwide, we found evidence that standards of care guidelines to improve health and well-being of pregnant incarcerated women, set by agencies such as American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, are not being followed in many facilities. Because not following these guidelines could pose major health risks to the mother and developing fetus, better policies, better enforcement of policies, and better common practices are needed to improve the health and welfare of pregnant incarcerated women.

Indexed as

Perinatal CarePregnant PeoplePrisonersRestraint, PhysicalAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansObstetric NursingPregnancyPrisonsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAnd withdrawalHealth careIncarcerated pregnant womenRestraintsShackles

Identifiers

PMID28236159
OpenAlexW2589324054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.