Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28235152›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2017

Parents' presence and parent-infant closeness in 11 neonatal intensive care units in six European countries vary between and within the countries.

Simo Raiskila, Anna Axelin, Liis Toome, Sylvia Caballero, Bente Silnes Tandberg, Rosario Montirosso, Erik Normann, Boubou Hallberg, Björn Westrup, Uwe Ewald and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Insurance and early racial disparities in skin-to-skin care during NICU hospitalization.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Sociodemographic characteristics of maternal presence in neonatal intensive care: an intersectional analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neonatal family-centered care: evidence and practice models.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simo RaiskilaTurku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Anna AxelinUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Liis ToomeTallinn Children's Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
Sylvia CaballeroHospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Bente Silnes TandbergDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Rosario Montirosso0-3 Centre for the at-Risk Infant, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Erik NormannPediatrics, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Boubou HallbergHuddinge Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Björn WestrupHuddinge Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uwe EwaldPediatrics, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Liisa LehtonenTurku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLittle is known about the amount of physical parent-infant closeness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and this study explored that issue in six European countries.

methodsThe parents of 328 preterm infants were recruited in 11 NICUs in Finland, Estonia, Sweden, Norway, Italy and Spain. They filled in daily diaries about how much time they spent in the NICU, in skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and holding their babies in the first two weeks of their hospitalisation.

resultsThe parents' NICU presence varied from a median of 3.3 (minimum 0.7-maximum 6.7) to 22.3 (18.7-24.0) hours per day (p < 0.001), SSC varied from 0.3 (0-1.4) to 6.6 (2.2-19.5) hours per day (p < 0.001) and holding varied from 0 (0-1.5) to 3.2 (0-7.4) hours per day (p < 0.001). Longer SSC was associated with singleton babies and more highly educated mothers. Holding the baby for longer was associated with gestational age. The most important factor supporting parent-infant closeness was the opportunity to stay overnight in the NICU. Having other children and the distance from home to the hospital had no impact on parent-infant closeness.

conclusionParents spent more time in NICUs if they could stay overnight, underlining the importance that these facilities play in establishing parent-infant closeness.

Indexed as

ParentingParentsEuropeHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalFamily-centred careKangaroo carePreterm infantsSingle-family room parent-infant closenessSkin-to-skin care

Identifiers

PMID28235152
PMCPMC5434801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.