Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28235064›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using stapler closure technique from one single surgeon.

Tao Xia, Jia-Yu Zhou, Yi-Ping Mou, Xiao-Wu Xu, Ren-Chao Zhang, Yu-Cheng Zhou, Rong-Gao Chen, Chao Lu, Chao-Jie Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pancreatic stump closure using only stapler is associated with high postoperative fistula rate after minimal invasive surgery.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao XiaDepartment of Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jia-Yu ZhouDepartment of Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yi-Ping MouDepartment of Gastrointestinal-Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Wu XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal-Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ren-Chao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal-Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yu-Cheng ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal-Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Rong-Gao ChenDepartment of Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chao LuDepartment of Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chao-Jie HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal-Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a safe and reliable treatment for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic surgery. Despite improvement in mortality, the rate of POPF still remains high and unsolved. To identify risk factors for POPF after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, clinicopathological variables on 120 patients who underwent LDP with stapler closure were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for POPF. The rate of overall and clinically significant POPF was 30.8% and13.3%, respectively. Higher BMI (≥25kg/m2) (p-value = 0.025) and longer operative time (p-value = 0.021) were associated with overall POPF but not clinically significant POPF. Soft parenchymal texture was significantly associated with both overall (p-value = 0.012) and clinically significant POPF (p-value = 0.000). In multivariable analyses, parenchymal texture (OR, 2.933, P-value = 0.011) and operative time (OR, 1.008, P-value = 0.022) were risk factors for overall POPF. Parenchymal texture was an independent predictive factor for clinically significant POPF (OR, 7.400, P-value = 0.001).

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28235064
PMCPMC5325559
OpenAlexW2589264023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.