ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
On the stability and dynamics of stochastic spiking neuron models: Nonlinear Hawkes process and point process GLMs.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring effective neuronal circuits via network flux counting.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A Population Coupling Model Identifies Reduced Propagation from V1 to Higher Visual Areas During Locomotion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stimulus-invariant aspects of the retinal code drive discriminability of natural scenes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The excess volatility puzzle explained by financial noise amplification from endogenous feedbacks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A framework for macroscopic phase-resetting curves for generalised spiking neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Modeling Long-Range Dynamic Correlations of Words in Written Texts with Hawkes Processes.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Metastable spiking networks in the replica-mean-field limit.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Variational Bayesian Inference for Nonlinear Hawkes Process with Gaussian Process Self-Effects.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mapping input noise to escape noise in integrate-and-fire neurons: a level-crossing approach.Biological cybernetics · 2021Article
- A self-exciting point process to study multicellular spatial signaling patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Efficient spline regression for neural spiking data.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Real-time predictions of the 2018-2019 Ebola virus disease outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo using Hawkes point process models.Epidemics · 2019Article
- Stability of stochastic finite-size spiking-neuron networks: Comparing mean-field, 1-loop correction and quasi-renewal approximations.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019Article
- Stability of point process spiking neuron models.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Towards a theory of cortical columns: From spiking neurons to interacting neural populations of finite size.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- From point process observations to collective neural dynamics: Nonlinear Hawkes process GLMs, low-dimensional dynamics and coarse graining.Journal of physiology, Paris · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point process generalized linear models (PP-GLMs) provide an important statistical framework for modeling spiking activity in single-neurons and neuronal networks. Stochastic stability is essential when sampling from these models, as done in computational neuroscience to analyze statistical properties of neuronal dynamics and in neuro-engineering to implement closed-loop applications. Here we show, however, that despite passing common goodness-of-fit tests, PP-GLMs estimated from data are often unstable, leading to divergent firing rates. The inclusion of absolute refractory periods is not a satisfactory solution since the activity then typically settles into unphysiological rates. To address these issues, we derive a framework for determining the existence and stability of fixed points of the expected conditional intensity function (CIF) for general PP-GLMs. Specifically, in nonlinear Hawkes PP-GLMs, the CIF is expressed as a function of the previous spike history and exogenous inputs. We use a mean-field quasi-renewal (QR) approximation that decomposes spike history effects into the contribution of the last spike and an average of the CIF over all spike histories prior to the last spike. Fixed points for stationary rates are derived as self-consistent solutions of integral equations. Bifurcation analysis and the number of fixed points predict that the original models can show stable, divergent, and metastable (fragile) dynamics. For fragile models, fluctuations of the single-neuron dynamics predict expected divergence times after which rates approach unphysiologically high values. This metric can be used to estimate the probability of rates to remain physiological for given time periods, e.g., for simulation purposes. We demonstrate the use of the stability framework using simulated single-neuron examples and neurophysiological recordings. Finally, we show how to adapt PP-GLM estimation procedures to guarantee model stability. Overall, our results provide a stability framework for data-driven PP-GLMs and shed new light on the stochastic dynamics of state-of-the-art statistical models of neuronal spiking activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.