Innovative practice model to optimize resource utilization and improve access to care for high-risk and

Linden Head, Carolyn Nessim, Kirsty Usher Boyd

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linden HeadFrom the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Head); the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Nessim); and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Usher Boyd).

Carolyn NessimFrom the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Head); the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Nessim); and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Usher Boyd).

Kirsty Usher BoydFrom the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Head); the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Nessim); and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Usher Boyd).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) has demonstrated breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk/

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of all high-risk/

resultsThere were 16 traditional patients and 13 RAPMIR patients. Mean wait time (days from referral to surgery) for RAPMIR was significantly shorter than for the traditional model (165.4 v. 309.2 d,

conclusionA multidisciplinary model with optimized scheduling has the potential to improve access to care and optimize resource utilization.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedOperating RoomsOrganizational InnovationProphylactic MastectomyRetrospective StudiesRiskUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBRAP protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID28234588

PMCPMC5373741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.