Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28234355›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2017

The emerging role of RNAs in DNA damage repair.

Ben R Hawley, Wei-Ting Lu, Ania Wilczynska, Martin Bushell

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Chromatin Remodeling and Epigenetic Regulation in Plant DNA Damage Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben R HawleyMRC Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2458-7868
Wei-Ting LuMRC Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1405-4806
Ania WilczynskaMRC Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK.
Martin BushellMRC Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK.
MRC Toxicology Unit · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_EX_G0902052Medical Research Council MC_UP_A600_1024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many surveillance and repair mechanisms exist to maintain the integrity of our genome. All of the pathways described to date are controlled exclusively by proteins, which through their enzymatic activities identify breaks, propagate the damage signal, recruit further protein factors and ultimately resolve the break with little to no loss of genetic information. RNA is known to have an integral role in many cellular pathways, but, until very recently, was not considered to take part in the DNA repair process. Several reports demonstrated a conserved critical role for RNA-processing enzymes and RNA molecules in DNA repair, but the biogenesis of these damage-related RNAs and their mechanisms of action remain unknown. We will explore how these new findings challenge the idea of proteins being the sole participants in the response to DNA damage and reveal a new and exciting aspect of both DNA repair and RNA biology.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA RepairHistonesHumansMicroRNAsRNATumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DEAD-box RNA HelicasesHistonesMicroRNAsRNATumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID28234355
PMCPMC5384027
OpenAlexW2590722734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.