ArticleEye (London, England)2017
Keraring implantation using the Zeiss Visumax femtosecond laser in the management of patients with keratoconus.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topographic Pattern-Based Nomogram to Guide Keraring Implantation in Eyes with Mild to Moderate Keratoconus: Visual and Refractive Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanted Kerarings in patients with mild, moderate, and severe keratoconus.Patients and methodsA 12-month retrospective case series of 70 eyes of 70 patients who underwent Keraring implantation with the Zeiss Visumax femtosecond laser. Patients were stratified into three groups according to their topography as mild (mean K <48 D) moderate (48-55 D) or severe (>55 D). Main outcome measures were visual acuity, manifest refraction, and corneal topography. Complications were recorded.ResultsA total of 66 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. In all, 4 rings were explanted, 3 due to no improvement in visual function and 1 due to corneal neovascularization. Also, 4 rings were repositioned. In mild disease (n=28), BCVA increased to 0.10 logMAR, sphere decreased to -1.54 D, cylinder decreased to 2.54 D, Kmax decreased to 46.25 D, and keratometric astigmatism to 3.88 D (P<0.01 for each compared with preoperative values). No patients lost vision. In moderate disease (n=27), sphere decreased to -4.06 D, cylinder decreased to 3.47 D, Kmax decreased to 51.69 D, and keratometric astigmatism to 4.56 D (P<0.05 for each compared with preoperative values). In severe disease (n=11), BCVA increased to 0.34 logMAR, Kmax decreased to 57.65 D, and keratometric astigmatism to 5.07 D (P<0.05 for each compared with preoperative values).ConclusionFemtosecond laser-assisted Keraring implantation is a safe and minimally invasive treatment option to improve the refraction and visual function in patients with keratoconus. Patients with mild keratoconus are more likely to have a favourable outcome following Keraring implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.