Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28234334›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Biosensors for the Detection of Food Pathogens.

Palmiro Poltronieri, Valeria Mezzolla, Elisabetta Primiceri, Giuseppe Maruccio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Voltammetric determination ofRSC advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Bovine mastitis prevention and control in the post-antibiotic era.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Palmiro PoltronieriInstitute of Sciences of Food Productions, National Research Council, ISPA-CNR, Via Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy. palmiro.poltronieri@ispa.cnr.it.
Valeria MezzollaInstitute of Sciences of Food Productions, National Research Council, ISPA-CNR, Via Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy. valeria.mezzolla@gmail.com.
Elisabetta PrimiceriNNL, Institute of Nanoscience-CNR, Via per Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy. elisabetta.primiceri@unisalento.it.
Giuseppe MaruccioNNL, Institute of Nanoscience-CNR, Via per Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy. giuseppe.maruccio@unisalento.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food pathogens frequently cause foodborne diseases. There is a need to rapidly identify the source of the bacteria in order to contain their spread and epidemics. A pre-enrichment culture or a direct culture on agar plate are standard microbiological methods. In this review, we present an update on alternative molecular methods to nucleic acid-based detection for species identification. Biosensor-based methods rely on the recognition of antigen targets or receptors by antibodies, aptamers or high-affinity ligands. The captured antigens may be then directly or indirectly detected through an antibody or high-affinity and high-specificity recognition molecule. Various different detection methods are discussed, from label-free sensors and immunosensors to fluorescence-based ones. Each method shows advantages and disadvantages in terms of equipment, sensitivity, simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Finally, lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices are introduced briefly, with the potential to be fast, sensitive and useful for on-site bacteria detection in food processing laboratories to check potential contamination by sample monitoring combined with a rapid pre-enrichment step.

Indexed as

antibody chipsdetection methodsfood pathogenslabellinglab-on-a-chipmolecular recognitionrapid identification

Identifiers

PMID28234334
PMCPMC5302249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.