Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28233844›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes.

Haifeng Hou, Tao Sun, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Li, Zheng Guo, Wei Wang, Dong Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04238338 (Association of Monocyte / Lymphocyte Ratio With Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04238338 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Association of Monocyte / Lymphocyte Ratio With Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorZhujiang HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled266ConditionsPeritoneal Dialysis, InflammationArmsmonocyte / lymphocyte ratio
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haifeng HouSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.
Tao SunSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.
Cheng LiRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yuanmin LiAffiliated Hospital, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.
Zheng GuoSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.
Wei WangSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.
Dong LiSchool of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for English and Chinese language publications up to November 30, 2015. We extracted data from publications matching our inclusion criteria for calculating pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was used to assess prognostic impact of RDW on CVD. Twenty-seven articles, consisting of 28 studies and 102,689 participants (mean age 63.9 years, 63,703 males/36,846 females, 2,140 gender-unmentioned subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs are 1.12 (95% CI = 1.09-1.15) for the association of all-cause mortality (ACM) per 1% increase of RDW, 1.12(95% CI = 1.08-1.17) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) per 1% increase of RDW. A dose-response curve relating RDW increase to its effect on CVD outcomes was established (p

Indexed as

Erythrocyte IndicesAgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesErythrocytesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28233844
PMCPMC5324076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.