ArticleScientific reports2017
Compact, cost-effective and field-portable microscope prototype based on MISHELF microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Iterating-Averaging Low Photon Budget Gabor Holographic Microscopy.ACS photonics · 2025Article
- Off-axis digital lensless holographic microscopy based on spatially multiplexed interferometry.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Single-shot wavelength-multiplexed phase microscopy under Gabor regime in a regular microscope embodiment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multi-Illumination Single-Holographic-Exposure Lensless Fresnel (MISHELF) Microscopy: Principles and Biomedical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Low-intensity illumination for lensless digital holographic microscopy with minimized sample interaction.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Accurate automatic object 4D tracking in digital in-line holographic microscopy based on computationally rendered dark fields.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Lensless Imaging.Optica · 2022Article
- Design, Calibration, and Application of a Robust, Cost-Effective, and High-Resolution Lensless Holographic Microscope.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3D-printable portable open-source platform for low-cost lens-less holographic cellular imaging.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report on a reduced cost, portable and compact prototype design of lensless holographic microscope with an illumination/detection scheme based on wavelength multiplexing, working with single hologram acquisition and using a fast convergence algorithm for image processing. All together, MISHELF (initials coming from Multi-Illumination Single-Holographic-Exposure Lensless Fresnel) microscopy allows the recording of three Fresnel domain diffraction patterns in a single camera snap-shot incoming from illuminating the sample with three coherent lights at once. Previous implementations have proposed an illumination/detection procedure based on a tuned (illumination wavelengths centered at the maximum sensitivity of the camera detection channels) configuration but here we report on a detuned (non-centered ones) scheme resulting in prototype miniaturization and cost reduction. Thus, MISHELF microscopy in combination with a novel and fast iterative algorithm allows high-resolution (μm range) phase-retrieved (twin image elimination) quantitative phase imaging of dynamic events (video rate recording speed). The performance of this microscope prototype is validated through experiments using both amplitude (USAF resolution test) and complex (live swine sperm cells and flowing microbeads) samples. The proposed method becomes in an alternative instrument improving some capabilities of existing lensless microscopes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.