Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28233252›Full record

ArticleAmbio2017

Do frogs really eat cardamom? Understanding the myth of crop damage by amphibians in the Western Ghats, India.

Arun Kanagavel, Sethu Parvathy, Nithula Nirmal, Nithin Divakar, Rajeev Raghavan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arun KanagavelConservation Research Group, St. Albert's College, Cochin, Kerala, 682018, India. arun.kanagavel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-282X
Sethu ParvathyConservation Research Group, St. Albert's College, Cochin, Kerala, 682018, India.
Nithula NirmalConservation Research Group, St. Albert's College, Cochin, Kerala, 682018, India.
Nithin DivakarConservation Research Group, St. Albert's College, Cochin, Kerala, 682018, India.
Rajeev RaghavanDepartment of Fisheries Resource Management, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS), Cochin, 682506, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Western Ghats of India, amphibians are culled at cardamom plantations since they are perceived to consume cardamom. To better understand the relationship between amphibians and cardamom, a study was undertaken at these plantations, which harbor numerous threatened and range-restricted amphibians. We undertook questionnaire surveys with 298 respondents at 148 plantations across southern India. Time-activity budget and diet analysis surveys were undertaken to determine whether amphibians really consumed cardamom. The conception that amphibians eat cardamom was found to be widespread especially among small-sized plantations, leading to negative perceptions and a lack of interest in amphibian conservation. The plantation community perceives a substantial economic loss due to amphibians, even though this is non-existent as revealed by our field surveys. These perceptions would lead to a continued intolerance of amphibian presence in plantations. A suitable outreach initiative re-affirming facts and spreading awareness on the positive role of amphibians would need to be conducted to negate this age-old myth.

Indexed as

AmphibiansCrop ProductionElettariaAnimalsHerbivoryIndiaAgroforestryCardamom plantationsDiet analysisFrogsLocal perceptionPesticide use

Identifiers

PMID28233252
PMCPMC5595740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.