Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28233231›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2017

The Role of Video Urodynamics in the Management of the Valve Bladder.

Charles W Concodora, Pramod P Reddy, Brian A VanderBrink

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles W ConcodoraDivision of Urology, Cincinnati Children's, MLC 5037, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. charles.concodora@gmail.com.
Pramod P ReddyDivision of Urology, Cincinnati Children's, MLC 5037, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Brian A VanderBrinkDivision of Urology, Cincinnati Children's, MLC 5037, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to bring the reader up-to-date on the current use of video urodynamics (VUDS) in the evaluation and management of the valve bladder. RECENT

findingsFindings show that multiple studies on valve bladder have utilized VUDS in some aspect of their research. VUDS is increasingly used in instances when vesicoureteral reflux, changing or inconsistent urodynamic studies, and bladder neck obstruction are a component of valve bladder. VUDS has also been used in pre-operative evaluation of patients with end-stage renal disease receiving a kidney transplant. Currently, there are no prospective studies looking at the use of VUDS and outcomes directly related to its use in patient assessment. The literature demonstrates that VUDS plays an integral role in the management of patients with valve bladder; however, additional research is required to better define the proper circumstances for its use.

Indexed as

UrodynamicsHumansRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic Surgical ProceduresMyogenic failurePediatric urologyPosterior urethral valvesValve bladderVideo urodynamics

Identifiers

PMID28233231
OpenAlexW2590955482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.