ArticleHeart and vessels2017
In-hospital management and outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy: a descriptive study using a national inpatient database in Japan.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in Initial Cardiac Function, Treatment, and Outcomes in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Impact on Left Ventricular Function and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Surgical volume reduction and the announcement of triage during the 1st wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a cohort study using an interrupted time series analysis.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Physical restraint of dementia patients in acute care hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort analysis in Japan.PloS one · 2021Article
- Intra-operative autologous blood donation for cardiovascular surgeries in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2021Observational
- A case of severe peripartum cardiomyopathy requiring left ventricular assist device implantation despite the absence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiology cases · 2020Article
- A left ventricular assist device for a patient with peripartum cardiomyopathy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2018Article
- Clinical features and peripartum outcomes in pregnant women with cardiac disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
- Determinants of survival and favorable neurologic outcomes in ischemic heart disease treated by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
- Seasonal variation in patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of Takotsubo syndrome: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare but life-threatening cardiac disorder characterized by maternal systolic heart failure. Although PPCM is a major cause of maternal mortality, little is known about the acute-phase management of PPCM in real-world clinical settings. We retrospectively identified patients hospitalized with PPCM from 2007 to 2014 using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We investigated patient characteristics, in-hospital examinations and treatment, and in-hospital outcomes. The study patients were 283 patients hospitalized with PPCM at 177 hospitals. The mean age was 32.7 ± 5.5 years. Of the eligible patients, 134 (47.3%) patients had a hypertensive disorder, including 48 (17.0%) patients with pre-eclampsia, and 111 (39.2%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit or emergency center. Coronary angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and endomyocardial biopsy were performed during hospitalization in 69 (24.4%), 42 (14.8%), and 43 (15.2%) patients, respectively. Invasive pulmonary artery pressure monitoring was used in 14 (4.9%) patients. Mechanical circulatory support was used in 13 (4.6%) patients (intra-aortic balloon pumping, n = 12; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, n = 5; ventricular assist device, n = 0). Catecholamine therapy and phosphodiesterase-III inhibitor therapy were used in 79 (27.9%) and 13 (4.6%) patients, respectively. Prolactin blockade therapy was used in 78 (27.6%) patients. During hospitalization, four (1.4%) patients died and nine (3.2%) patients developed ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Two (0.7%) patients received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, but no patient received other permanent cardiac devices. This retrospective cohort study suggests that attending physicians should be ready to provide intensive care for patients with PPCM during the acute phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.