ReviewDer Internist2017
[Diabetology as an interdisciplinary challenge].
Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Interprofessional collaboration in internal medicine : Developments between health professions in German language publications].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing chronic disease with a complex pathophysiology and multiple therapeutic options. Clinical prognosis is determined by multimorbidity and cardiovascular complications. For example, the prognosis of patients with diabetes hospitalized for heart failure is very poor with up to 50% mortality rate over the 3 years thereafter. Therefore, three levels have to be addressed in our approach to interdisciplinary diabetes care: screening and prevention, efficient patient-centered drug therapy, and a strategy for care including social environment of the patient suffering from complex diseases. Thus, we need diabetes specialists in out- and in-patient settings. Transsectoral interdisciplinary approaches to clinical care, as exemplary shown for the treatment of the diabetes foot syndrome, should be developed for other comorbidities, like renal and heart failure, respectively. The basis in the therapy of the cardiometabolic high-risk patient is prevention and multimodal treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. In this context, it is interesting to note that new cardiovascular outcome trials with a so-called safety design have shown that the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and the SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin can reduce cardiovascular event rates. In addition, empagliflozin has significantly reduced the rate of hospitalization for heart failure. The latter has been included in the recent guidelines on heart failure by the European Society of Cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.