ArticleThe oncologist2017
Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome.
Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Global research trends in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of liver tumour burden, alkaline phosphatase elevation, and target lesion size on treatment outcomes withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Trial
- Patient characteristics and prognostic factors in advanced treatment lines in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Lighting up PNETs: Creating Murine Models with a Novel Bioluminescent Cell Line.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Hypoattenuation Pattern on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting the Unpredictable: AI-Driven Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancers · 2026Review
- Enhancing patient-centered care with AI: a study of responses to neuroendocrine neoplasms queries.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Prognosis of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Radiomics in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Identifying responders to somatostatin analogs.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Liver metastases in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comparative study of hepatic tumor volume and biochemical findings in NET G3 versus NEC.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2024Article
- Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current development, challenges, and clinical perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcome of Patients with Gastric, Duodenal, or Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors after Incomplete Endoscopic Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: the rising promise of conservative endoscopic management.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Utility of histopathological revision in the management of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia.Endocrine · 2023Article
- When Should We Adopt EUS-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Management of Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral risk factors predict clinical outcome in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs); however, the impact of their combination has not been investigated so far. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of stage IV GEP-NENs was performed. Multivariate analysis for progression of disease (PD) was performed by Cox proportional hazards method to obtain a risk score. Area under the curve obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the score performance. Progression-free survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsTwo hundred eighty-three stage IV GEP-NENs were evaluated, including 93 grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (32.9%), 153 grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors (54%), and 37 grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (13.1%). Independent risk factors for PD were Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The risk score was calculated as follows: (0.025 × Ki67) + [(0 if no liver metastases or liver involvement <25%) OR (0.405 if liver involvement 25%-50%) OR (0.462 if liver involvement >50%)] + [(0 if no extra-abdominal metastases) OR (0.528 if extra-abdominal metastases present)]. The risk score accuracy to predict PD was superior compared with the G grading system (area under the curve: 0.705 and 0.622, respectively). Three subgroups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of PD according to risk score were identified, median progression-free survival being 26 months, 19 months, and 12 months, respectively.
conclusionIn stage IV GEP-NENs, a risk score able to predict PD was obtained by combining Ki67, proportion of metastatic liver involvement, and presence of extra-abdominal metastases. The score may help to discriminate patients with different progression risk level to plan tailored therapeutic approaches and follow-up programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.