Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28232467›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Internet-based cognitive-behavioural writing therapy for reducing post-traumatic stress after intensive care for sepsis in patients and their spouses (REPAIR): study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial.

Romina Gawlytta, Helen Niemeyer, Maria Böttche, André Scherag, Christine Knaevelsrud, Jenny Rosendahl

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. A Review of Persistent Post-COVID Syndrome (PPCS).Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romina GawlyttaInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Helen NiemeyerDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maria BöttcheDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
André ScheragIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jenny RosendahlInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-7571
Freie Universität Berlin · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a consequence of sepsis and intensive care, considerable proportions of patients but also of their spouses develop a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, only a very small number receive psychotherapeutic treatment. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural writing therapy (IB-CBWT) has proven to be an effective treatment option for PTSD. It seems to fit the specific needs of this cohort and to overcome treatment barriers. Aim of the REPAIR trial is to examine the efficacy, safety and applicability of IB-CBWT for PTSD in patients and their spouses after intensive care for sepsis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants will be assigned randomly either to a treatment or a wait-list (WL) control group. The treatment group receives IB-CBWT for PTSD, actively involving the partners of the participants. IB-CBWT will be guided by a therapist and comprises two written assignments per week over a 5 week period. After completing the assignments, the participants obtain individual responses from the therapist. Participants of the WL control group will receive treatment after a waiting period of 5 weeks. The primary outcome is PTSD symptom severity in self-rated PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fifth Edition at the end of treatment and waiting time, respectively. Secondary outcomes are remission of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and somatisation measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, marital satisfaction measured by the Relationship Assessment Scale, health-related quality of life measured by the EQ-5D-5L, and the feasibility of IB-CBWT for this cohort (ie, dropout rate). Statistical analysis will be performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice and has been approved by the ethics committee of the Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany. Results will be disseminated at scientific conferences, published in peer-reviewed journals, and provided to consumers of healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, DRKS00010676.

Indexed as

WritingAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCritical CareFemaleGermanyHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeRegression AnalysisResearch DesignSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexCognitive behavior therapyInternetPosttraumatic stress disorderRandomized controlled trialSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28232467
PMCPMC5337733
OpenAlexW2589806394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.