Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28232121›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Improving data availability for brain image biobanking in healthy subjects: Practice-based suggestions from an international multidisciplinary working group.

BRAINS (Brain Imaging in Normal Subjects) Expert Working Group, Susan D Shenkin, Cyril Pernet, Thomas E Nichols, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Paul M Matthews, Aad van der Lugt, Clare Mackay, Linda Lanyon, Bernard Mazoyer and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From calcium imaging to graph topology.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting age from cortical structure across the lifespan.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Human brain atlasing: past, present and future.The neuroradiology journal · 2017
    Review
  16. Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

BRAINS (Brain Imaging in Normal Subjects) Expert Working Group
Susan D ShenkinGeriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: Susan.Shenkin@ed.ac.uk.
Cyril PernetScottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Thomas E NicholsDepartment of Statistics & WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Jean-Baptiste PolineHenry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, 132 Barker Hall, Office 210S, MC 3190, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Paul M MatthewsDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clare MackayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Linda LanyonInternational Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 15A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Bernard MazoyerGroupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des maladies neurodégénératives, Université de Bordeaux, CEA, CNRS, UMR5293, France.
James P BoardmanMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Paul M ThompsonKeck USC School of Medicine; NIH ENIGMA Center for Worldwide Medicine, Imaging and Genomics; Professor of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, Pediatrics, Engineering & Ophthalmology; USC Imaging Genetics Center, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Nick FoxDementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Daniel S MarcusDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Aziz SheikhCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Simon R CoxCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK.
Devasuda AnblaganCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Dominic E JobScottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK.
David Alexander DickieScottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
David RodriguezScottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Joanna M WardlawCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

TR&D3: Intrinsic Surface MappingP41EB015922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2012 to 2022
$14.1M
Training U54EB020403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2018
$10.1M
Growth factors, neuroinflammation, exercise, and brain integrityRF1AG041915 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2014
$2.9M
Medical Research Council G0701120Medical Research Council G0701127Medical Research Council G9409634Medical Research Council MC_PC_17114Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Medical Research Council MR/M009106/1Medical Research Council MR/M024903/1Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG041915NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015922NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020403Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100309/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain imaging is now ubiquitous in clinical practice and research. The case for bringing together large amounts of image data from well-characterised healthy subjects and those with a range of common brain diseases across the life course is now compelling. This report follows a meeting of international experts from multiple disciplines, all interested in brain image biobanking. The meeting included neuroimaging experts (clinical and non-clinical), computer scientists, epidemiologists, clinicians, ethicists, and lawyers involved in creating brain image banks. The meeting followed a structured format to discuss current and emerging brain image banks; applications such as atlases; conceptual and statistical problems (e.g. defining 'normality'); legal, ethical and technological issues (e.g. consents, potential for data linkage, data security, harmonisation, data storage and enabling of research data sharing). We summarise the lessons learned from the experiences of a wide range of individual image banks, and provide practical recommendations to enhance creation, use and reuse of neuroimaging data. Our aim is to maximise the benefit of the image data, provided voluntarily by research participants and funded by many organisations, for human health. Our ultimate vision is of a federated network of brain image biobanks accessible for large studies of brain structure and function.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualNeuroimagingDatabase Management SystemsHumansInformation DisseminationInformation Storage and RetrievalBrain image biobankData sharingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID28232121
PMCPMC5798604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.