Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28231828›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2017

Anxiety, emotional processing and depression in people with multiple sclerosis.

Marie-Claire Gay, Catherine Bungener, Sarah Thomas, Pierre Vrignaud, Peter W Thomas, Roger Baker, Sébastien Montel, Olivier Heinzlef, Caroline Papeix, Rana Assouad and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie-Claire GayPsychology Department, University of Paris West, Nanterre, France. marieclaire.gay@gmail.com.
Catherine BungenerLaboratory of Psychopathology, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Sarah ThomasClinical Research Unit, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Pierre VrignaudPsychology Department, University of Paris West, Nanterre, France.
Peter W ThomasClinical Research Unit, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Roger BakerClinical Research Unit, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Sébastien MontelPsychology Department, University of Paris 8, St Denis, France.
Olivier HeinzlefNeurology Department, Hospital of Poissy-St-Germain en Laye, Paris, France.
Caroline PapeixNeurology Department, GHPS Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Rana AssouadNeurology Department, GHPS Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Michèle MontreuilPsychology Department, University of Paris 8, St Denis, France.
Bournemouth University · GBPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRUniversité Paris 8 · FRUniversité Paris Nanterre · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high comorbidity of anxiety and depression in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), little is known about their inter-relationships. Both involve emotional perturbations and the way in which emotions are processed is likely central to both. The aim of the current study was to explore relationships between the domains of mood, emotional processing and coping and to analyse how anxiety affects coping, emotional processing, emotional balance and depression in people with MS.

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire study involving 189 people with MS with a confirmed diagnosis of MS recruited from three French hospitals. Study participants completed a battery of questionnaires encompassing the following domains: i. anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)); ii. emotional processing (Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25)); iii. positive and negative emotions (Positive and Negative Emotionality Scale (EPN-31)); iv. alexithymia (Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire) and v. coping (Coping with Health Injuries and Problems-Neuro (CHIP-Neuro) questionnaire. Relationships between these domains were explored using path analysis.

resultsAnxiety was a strong predictor of depression, in both a direct and indirect way, and our model explained 48% of the variance of depression. Gender and functional status (measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale) played a modest role. Non-depressed people with MS reported high levels of negative emotions and low levels of positive emotions. Anxiety also had an indirect impact on depression via one of the subscales of the Emotional Processing Scale ("Unregulated Emotion") and via negative emotions (EPN-31).

conclusionsThis research confirms that anxiety is a vulnerability factor for depression via both direct and indirect pathways. Anxiety symptoms should therefore be assessed systematically and treated in order to lessen the likelihood of depression symptoms.

Indexed as

EmotionsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMultiple SclerosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesYoung AdultAnxietyCopingDepressionEmotional ProcessingMoodMultiple sclerosisPredictors

Identifiers

PMID28231828
PMCPMC5324294
OpenAlexW2589747019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.