Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28231762›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Gene expression regional differences in human subcutaneous adipose tissue.

Angelina Passaro, Maria Agata Miselli, Juana Maria Sanz, Edoardo Dalla Nora, Mario Luca Morieri, Rossella Colonna, Rado Pišot, Giovanni Zuliani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Associations of muscle and adipose tissue parameters with long-term outcomes in middle and low rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelina PassaroAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. psn@unife.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-7000
Maria Agata MiselliAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Juana Maria SanzDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Internal Medicine and CardioRespiratory, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Edoardo Dalla NoraAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Mario Luca MorieriAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Rossella ColonnaAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Rado PišotScience and Research Centre, University of Primorska, Koper, 6000, Slovenia.
Giovanni ZulianiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is clearly associated with an increased risk of obesity-related diseases and all-cause mortality, whereas gluteal subcutaneous fat accumulation (g-SAT) is associated with a lower risk. The relative contribution, in term of cardiovascular risk, of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (a-SAT) is still controversial with studies showing both a detrimental effect and a protective role. Animal and in vitro studies demonstrated that adipocytes from visceral and subcutaneous depots have distinct morphological, metabolic and functional characteristics. These regional differences have a key role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related diseases. There is recent evidence that differentiation between upper-body and lower-body adipose tissues might be under control of site-specific sets of developmental genes, such as Homebox (HOX) genes, a group of related genes that control the body plan of an embryo along the anterior-posterior axis. However, the possible heterogeneity between different subcutaneous regions has not been extensively investigated. Here we studied global mRNA expression in g-SAT and a-SAT with a microarray approach. RNA was isolated from g-SAT and a-SAT biopsy, from eight healthy subjects, and hybridized on RNA microarray chips in order to detect regional differences in gene expression.

resultsA total of 131 genes are significantly and differently (>1.5 fold change, p < 0.05) expressed in a-SAT and g-SAT. Expression profiling reveals significant differences in expression of several HOX genes. Interestingly, two molecular signature of visceral adipocyte lineage, homebox genes HOXA5 and NR2F1, are up-regulated in a-SAT versus g-SAT by a 2.5 fold change.

conclusionsOur study shows that g-SAT and a-SAT have distinct expression profiles. The finding of a different expression of HOX genes, fundamental during the embryo development, suggests an early regional differentiation of subcutaneous adipose depots. Moreover, the higher expression of HOXA5 and NR2F1, two molecular signatures of visceral adipocytes, in a-SAT suggests that this subcutaneous adipose depot could be more similar to VAT than g-SAT. Our data suggest that we should look at SAT as composed of distinct depots with possibly different impact in obesity associated metabolic complications.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAgedBiomarkersCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SpecificitySubcutaneous FatBiomarkersAdipose tissueHomeobox genesMicroarrayObesitySATVAT

Identifiers

PMID28231762
PMCPMC5324328
OpenAlexW2591570422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.