Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28231310›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Breastfeeding and the risk of respiratory tract infections after infancy: The Generation R Study.

Ilse Tromp, Jessica Kiefte-de Jong, Hein Raat, Vincent Jaddoe, Oscar Franco, Albert Hofman, Johan de Jongste, Henriëtte Moll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Moderate-to-late prematurity: understanding respiratory consequences and modifiable risk factors.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Nutrients · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilse TrompThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jessica Kiefte-de JongThe Department of Pediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein RaatThe Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent JaddoeThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oscar FrancoThe Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Albert HofmanThe Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan de JongsteThe Department of Pediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriëtte MollThe Department of Pediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe protection of breastfeeding against respiratory tract infections in the first year of life has often been suggested. Few studies examined the effect of breastfeeding on respiratory tract infections after infancy.

objectiveTo examine the association between breastfeeding with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) after infancy up to 4 years of age (n = 5322).

methodsThis study was embedded in The Generation R study, a Dutch population-based prospective cohort study from fetal life until young adulthood. Information on breastfeeding duration (never; <3 months; 3-6 months; ≥6 months) and dose (never; partially until 4 months; predominantly until 4 months) were collected by questionnaire at 2, 6, and 12 months of age. Information on doctor attendance for LRTI and URTI were obtained by questionnaire at 2, 3, and 4 years of age.

resultsBreastfeeding for 6 months or longer was significantly associated with a reduced risk of LRTI up to 4 years of age (aOR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51-0.98). Similar ORs for LRTI were found with breastfeeding for less than 3 months and 3-6 months. Although in the same direction, weaker ORs were found for URTI and breastfeeding duration. The same trend was found for partial and predominant breastfeeding until 4 months and LRTI and URTI.

conclusionBreastfeeding duration for 6 months or longer is associated with a reduced risk of LRTI in pre-school children. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that the protective effect of breastfeeding for respiratory tract infections persist after infancy therefore supporting current recommendations for breastfeeding for at least 6 months.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsRiskTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28231310
PMCPMC5322970
OpenAlexW2589699200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.