Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230848›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2017

Computational approaches to fMRI analysis.

Jonathan D Cohen, Nathaniel Daw, Barbara Engelhardt, Uri Hasson, Kai Li, Yael Niv, Kenneth A Norman, Jonathan Pillow, Peter J Ramadge, Nicholas B Turk-Browne and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Human Cerebellum Encodes Temporally Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rethinking Naturalistic Movie Neuroimaging Through Film Form.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Large-Scale Color Biases in the Retinotopic Functional Architecture Are Region Specific and Shared across Human Brains.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Nathaniel DawPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-1430
Barbara EngelhardtDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Kai LiDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Yael NivPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-8371
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Jonathan PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Peter J RamadgeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Nicholas B Turk-BrownePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Theodore L WillkeIntel Labs, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California, USA.

Funding

Modeling the Neural Basis of Episodic MemoryR01MH069456 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KENNETH A NORMAN, Nicholas Benjamin Turk-Browne · 2004 to 2026
$7.2M
Neural and Behavioral Interactions Between Attention, Perception, and LearningR01EY021755 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TURK-BROWNE, NICHOLAS BENJAMIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021755NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis methods in cognitive neuroscience have not always matched the richness of fMRI data. Early methods focused on estimating neural activity within individual voxels or regions, averaged over trials or blocks and modeled separately in each participant. This approach mostly neglected the distributed nature of neural representations over voxels, the continuous dynamics of neural activity during tasks, the statistical benefits of performing joint inference over multiple participants and the value of using predictive models to constrain analysis. Several recent exploratory and theory-driven methods have begun to pursue these opportunities. These methods highlight the importance of computational techniques in fMRI analysis, especially machine learning, algorithmic optimization and parallel computing. Adoption of these techniques is enabling a new generation of experiments and analyses that could transform our understanding of some of the most complex-and distinctly human-signals in the brain: acts of cognition such as thoughts, intentions and memories.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainCognitionHumansLearningModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID28230848
PMCPMC5457304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.