Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230734›Full record

ArticleGenes2017

Deep Transcriptome Sequencing of Two Green Algae, Chara vulgaris and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,  Provides No Evidence of Organellar RNA Editing.

A Bruce Cahoon, John A Nauss, Conner D Stanley, Ali Qureshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Translation in Mitochondrial Ribosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Bruce CahoonDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Virginia's College at Wise, 1 College Ave., Wise, VA 24293, USA. abc6c@uvawise.edu.
John A NaussDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Virginia's College at Wise, 1 College Ave., Wise, VA 24293, USA. jan78@pitt.edu.
Conner D StanleyDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Virginia's College at Wise, 1 College Ave., Wise, VA 24293, USA. cds6f@uvawise.edu.
Ali QureshiDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Virginia's College at Wise, 1 College Ave., Wise, VA 24293, USA. aliq30@gmail.com.
University of Virginia's College at Wise · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly all land plants post-transcriptionally modify specific nucleotides within RNAs, a process known as RNA editing. This adaptation allows the correction of deleterious mutations within the asexually reproducing and presumably non-recombinant chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. There are no reports of RNA editing in any of the green algae so this phenomenon is presumed to have originated in embryophytes either after the invasion of land or in the now extinct algal ancestor of all land plants. This was challenged when a recent in silico screen for RNA edit sites based on genomic sequence homology predicted edit sites in the green alga Chara vulgaris, a multicellular alga found within the Streptophyta clade and one of the closest extant algal relatives of land plants. In this study, the organelle transcriptomes of C. vulgaris and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were deep sequenced for a comprehensive assessment of RNA editing. Initial analyses based solely on sequence comparisons suggested potential edit sites in both species, but subsequent high-resolution melt analysis, RNase H-dependent PCR (rhPCR), and Sanger sequencing of DNA and complementary DNAs (cDNAs) from each of the putative edit sites revealed them to be either single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or spurious deep sequencing results. The lack of RNA editing in these two lineages is consistent with the current hypothesis that RNA editing evolved after embryophytes split from its ancestral algal lineage.

Indexed as

Chara  vulgarisChlamydomonas  reinhardtiichloroplastgreen  algaemitochondriaRNA  editing

Identifiers

PMID28230734
PMCPMC5333069
OpenAlexW2589703780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.