Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230640›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2017

Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database.

Noelle H Ebel, Evelyn K Hsu, Kristin Berry, Simon P Horslen, George N Ioannou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Payer Status on Delisting Among Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noelle H Ebel1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 2 Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA. 3 Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA. 4 Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Evelyn K Hsu
Kristin Berry
Simon P Horslen
George N Ioannou

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GI TRAINING GRANTT32DK007742 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 1996 to 2022
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated liver transplantation waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes in those aged 18 to 24 years compared with both younger (0-17 years) and older (25-34 years) registrants and recipients.

methodsUsing national data from the United Network for Organ Sharing, competing risk, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed on first-time liver transplant registrants (n = 13 979) and recipients (n = 8718) ages 0 to 34 years between 2002 and 2015.

resultsNonstatus 1A registrants, registrants aged 0 to 17 and 25 to 34 years were less likely to experience dropout from the waiting list compared with those aged 18 to 24 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0-5 years = 0.36; 6-11 = 0.29; 12-17 = 0.48; 18-24 = 1.00; 25-34 = 0.82). Although there was no difference in risk of graft failure across all age groups, both younger and older age groups had significantly lower risk of posttransplant mortality compared with those aged 18 to 24 years (adjusted hazard ratio, for 0-5 years = 0.53, 6-11 = 0.48, 12-17 = 0.70, 18-24 = 1.00, 25-34 = 0.77). This may be related to lower likelihood of retransplantation after graft failure in those aged 18 to 24 years.

conclusionsThis national registry study demonstrates for the first time poorer waitlist and postliver transplant outcomes in young adults ages 18 to 24 years at the time of listing and transplantation compared to older and younger age groups. Given the potential survival benefit in transplanting young adults and the shortage of solid organs for transplant, future studies are critical to identify and target modifiable risk factors to improve waitlist and long-term posttransplant outcomes in 18- to 24-year-old registrants and recipients.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesWaiting ListsAdolescentAdultAge DistributionAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier Estimate

Identifiers

PMID28230640
PMCPMC5481466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.