Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230262›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the dabigatran reversal agent idarucizumab during Phase I studies.

Stephen Norris, Steven Ramael, Ippei Ikushima, Wouter Haazen, Akiko Harada, Viktoria Moschetti, Susumu Imazu, Paul A Reilly, Benjamin Lang, Joachim Stangier and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Stephen NorrisBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
Steven RamaelSGS Life Sciences Clinical Research Services, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ippei IkushimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Souseikai Global Clinical Research Center, Sumida Hospital, LTA Medical Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Wouter HaazenSGS Life Sciences Clinical Research Services, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Antwerp, Belgium.
Akiko HaradaNippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Viktoria MoschettiBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Susumu ImazuNippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Paul A ReillyBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
Benjamin LangBoehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riß, Germany.
Joachim StangierBoehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riß, Germany.
Stephan GlundBoehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riß, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USClinical Research Services · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Japan) · JPBoehringer Ingelheim (Philippines) · PHSOUSEIKAI Global Clinical Research Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIdarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-dabigatran antibody fragment, is effective in emergency reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation. Pre-existing and treatment-emergent anti-idarucizumab antibodies (antidrug antibodies; ADA) may affect the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab. This analysis characterized the pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA and assessed their impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of idarucizumab.

methodsData were pooled from three Phase I, randomized, double-blind idarucizumab studies in healthy Caucasian subjects; elderly, renally impaired subjects; and healthy Japanese subjects. In plasma sampled before and after idarucizumab dosing, ADA were detected and titrated using a validated electrochemiluminescence method. ADA epitope specificities were examined using idarucizumab and two structurally related molecules. Idarucizumab PK/PD data were compared for subjects with and without pre-existing ADA.

resultsPre-existing ADA were found in 33 out of 283 individuals (11.7%), seven of whom had intermittent ADA. Titres of pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were low, estimated equivalent to <0.3% of circulating idarucizumab after a 5 g dose. Pre-existing ADA had no impact on dose-normalized idarucizumab maximum plasma levels and exposure and, although data were limited, no impact on the reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation by idarucizumab. Treatment-emergent ADA were detected in 20 individuals (19 out of 224 treated [8.5%]; 1 out of 59 received placebo [1.7%]) and were transient in ten. The majority had specificity primarily toward the C-terminus of idarucizumab. There were no adverse events indicative of immunogenic reactions.

conclusionPre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were present at extremely low levels relative to the idarucizumab dosage under evaluation. The PK/PD of idarucizumab appeared to be unaffected by the presence of pre-existing ADA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntithrombinsBlood CoagulationDabigatranDouble-Blind MethodEpitopesHealthy VolunteersHemorrhageHumansLuminescenceMiddle AgedRenal InsufficiencyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntithrombinsDabigatranEpitopesidarucizumabantibodiesanticoagulantscoagulationimmunologypharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28230262
PMCPMC5510069
OpenAlexW2589750406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.