Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230180›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Assessment of Chicken Carcass Microbiome Responses During Processing in the Presence of Commercial Antimicrobials Using a Next Generation Sequencing Approach.

Sun Ae Kim, Si Hong Park, Sang In Lee, Casey M Owens, Steven C Ricke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Osmotic Stress Adaptation of Poultry-AssociatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation of a Commercial Qualitative BAXFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality and Processability of Modern Poultry Meat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Select Phytochemicals ReduceFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sun Ae KimCenter for Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA.
Si Hong ParkCenter for Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA.
Sang In LeeCenter for Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA.
Casey M OwensDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA.
Steven C RickeCenter for Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to 1) identify microbial compositional changes on chicken carcasses during processing, 2) determine the antimicrobial efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA) and Amplon (blend of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate) at a poultry processing pilot plant scale, and 3) compare microbial communities between chicken carcass rinsates and recovered bacteria from media. Birds were collected from each processing step and rinsates were applied to estimate aerobic plate count (APC) and Campylobacter as well as Salmonella prevalence. Microbiome sequencing was utilized to identify microbial population changes over processing and antimicrobial treatments. Only the PAA treatment exhibited significant reduction of APC at the post chilling step while both Amplon and PAA yielded detectable Campylobacter reductions at all steps. Based on microbiome sequencing, Firmicutes were the predominant bacterial group at the phyla level with over 50% frequency in all steps while the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased as processing progressed. Overall microbiota between rinsate and APC plate microbial populations revealed generally similar patterns at the phyla level but they were different at the genus level. Both antimicrobials appeared to be effective on reducing problematic bacteria and microbiome can be utilized to identify optimal indicator microorganisms for enhancing product quality.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial LoadCampylobacterChickensFood HandlingMicrobiotaPeracetic AcidSalmonellaSulfatesSulfuric AcidsAnti-Infective AgentsPeracetic Acidsodium sulfateSulfatessulfuric acidSulfuric Acids

Identifiers

PMID28230180
PMCPMC5322484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.