Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28230067›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Life strategy and grazing intensity responses of Brachionus calyciflorus fed on different concentrations of microcystin-producing and microcystin-free Microcystis aeruginosa.

Ye Liang, Kai Ouyang, Xinglan Chen, Yuqi Su, Jiaxin Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ye LiangJiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Biodiversity &Biotechnology and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Fisheries Live Food, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China.
Kai OuyangJiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Biodiversity &Biotechnology and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Fisheries Live Food, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China.
Xinglan ChenJiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Biodiversity &Biotechnology and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Fisheries Live Food, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China.
Yuqi SuJiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Biodiversity &Biotechnology and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Fisheries Live Food, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China.
Jiaxin YangJiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Biodiversity &Biotechnology and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Fisheries Live Food, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China.
Nanjing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of Microcystis blooms is a worldwide concern due to the numerous adverse effects on zooplankton. We therefore hypothesized that the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa is harmful to rotifer growth. Population and individual experiments were conducted with the same proportional volumes of Chlorella and Microcystis for given food densities. Life-table parameters, life-history traits, and the grazing intensity of Brachionus calyciflorus were evaluated after they had fed on microcystin-producing and microcystin-free Microcystis, both alone and combined with an edible alga (Chlorella pyrenoidosa), at concentrations of 1 × 10

Indexed as

AnimalsChlorellaFeeding BehaviorMicrocystinsMicrocystisRotiferamicrocystinMicrocystins

Identifiers

PMID28230067
PMCPMC5322320
OpenAlexW2589746135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.