Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28229910›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography

Optimized energy of spectral CT for infarct imaging: Experimental validation with human validation.

Veit Sandfort, Srikanth Palanisamy, Rolf Symons, Amir Pourmorteza, Mark A Ahlman, Kelly Rice, Tom Thomas, Cynthia Davies-Venn, Bernhard Krauss, Alan Kwan and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spectral performance evaluation of a second-generation spectral detector CT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Applications of Dual-Energy CT.Korean journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Veit SandfortRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Srikanth PalanisamyRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rolf SymonsRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Amir PourmortezaRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark A AhlmanRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kelly RiceORS Division of Veterinary Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tom ThomasORS Division of Veterinary Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cynthia Davies-VennRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bernhard KraussSiemens AG, Healthcare Sector, Forchheim, Germany.
Alan KwanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ankur PandeyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stefan L ZimmermanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David A BluemkeRadiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: bluemked@cc.nih.gov.

Funding

Molecular Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (NIBIB)ZIAEB000072 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI BLUEMKE, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$5.0M
Molecular Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (CC)ZIACL090019 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI JONES, ELIZABETH C. · 2010 to 2017
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL090019Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EB000072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLate contrast enhancement visualizes myocardial infarction, but the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) is low using conventional CT. The aim of this study was to determine if spectral CT can improve imaging of myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA canine model of myocardial infarction was produced in 8 animals (90-min occlusion, reperfusion). Later, imaging was performed after contrast injection using CT at 90 kVp/150 kVpSn. The following reconstructions were evaluated: Single energy 90 kVp, mixed, iodine map, multiple monoenergetic conventional and monoenergetic noise optimized reconstructions. Regions of interest were measured in infarct and remote regions to calculate contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and Bhattacharya distance (a metric of the differentiation between regions). Blinded assessment of image quality was performed. The same reconstruction methods were applied to CT scans of four patients with known infarcts.

resultsFor animal studies, the highest CNR for infarct vs. myocardium was achieved in the lowest keV (40 keV) VMo images (CNR 4.42, IQR 3.64-5.53), which was superior to 90 kVp, mixed and iodine map (p = 0.008, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to 90 kVp and iodine map, the 40 keV VMo reconstructions showed significantly higher histogram separation (p = 0.042 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The VMo reconstructions showed the highest rate of excellent quality scores. A similar pattern was seen in human studies, with CNRs for infarct maximized at the lowest keV optimized reconstruction (CNR 4.44, IQR 2.86-5.94).

conclusionsDual energy in conjunction with noise-optimized monoenergetic post-processing improves CNR of myocardial infarct delineation by approximately 20-25%.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsFemaleHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedDelayed iodine CTDual energy CTInfarctVirtual monoenergetic

Identifiers

PMID28229910
PMCPMC5433893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.