Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28229538›Full record

ReviewObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2017

Biological control of appetite: A daunting complexity.

Paul S MacLean, John E Blundell, Julie A Mennella, Rachel L Batterham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Methanol extract ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Article
  13. Behavioural susceptibility theory: the role of appetite in genetic susceptibility to obesity in early life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Obesity and Diabetes in Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Role of Leu72Met ofNutrients · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul S MacLeanUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
John E BlundellFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Julie A MennellaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rachel L BatterhamCentre for Obesity Research, Rayne Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Wendy M Kohrt · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Sex Hormones Differentially Regulate Production of Distinct Adipocyte PopulationP50HD073063 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KOHRT, WENDY M · 2012 to 2017
$5.7M
Impact of diet composition during infancy on energy balance, satiety and growthR01HD072307 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE, TRABULSI, JILLIAN CHRISTINE · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Postnatal Actions of Maternal Obesity on Neonatal Metabolic HealthR01HD075285 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MACLEAN, PAUL S., MCMANAMAN, JAMES LEWIS · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
A Narrowed Window for Targeting Metabolic Flexibility in Breast Cancer PreventionR01CA164166 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MACLEAN, PAUL S., SCHEDIN, PEPPER J · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G005524/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/05079Department of Health RP-2015-06-005NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164166NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD073063NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072307NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075285NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review summarizes a portion of the discussions of an NIH Workshop (Bethesda, MD, 2015) titled "Self-Regulation of Appetite-It's Complicated," which focused on the biological aspects of appetite regulation.

methodsThis review summarizes the key biological inputs of appetite regulation and their implications for body weight regulation.

resultsThese discussions offer an update of the long-held, rigid perspective of an "adipocentric" biological control, taking a broader view that also includes important inputs from the digestive tract, from lean mass, and from the chemical sensory systems underlying taste and smell. It is only beginning to be understood how these biological systems are integrated and how this integrated input influences appetite and food eating behaviors. The relevance of these biological inputs was discussed primarily in the context of obesity and the problem of weight regain, touching on topics related to the biological predisposition for obesity and the impact that obesity treatments (dieting, exercise, bariatric surgery, etc.) might have on appetite and weight loss maintenance. Finally considered is a common theme that pervaded the workshop discussions, which was individual variability.

conclusionsIt is this individual variability in the predisposition for obesity and in the biological response to weight loss that makes the biological component of appetite regulation so complicated. When this individual biological variability is placed in the context of the diverse environmental and behavioral pressures that also influence food eating behaviors, it is easy to appreciate the daunting complexities that arise with the self-regulation of appetite.

Indexed as

AppetiteAppetite RegulationBariatric SurgeryBody WeightDietExerciseFeeding BehaviorGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansObesity

Identifiers

PMID28229538
PMCPMC5407690
OpenAlexW2625007078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.