Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28229299›Full record

ReviewSurgery today2017

History, molecular features, and clinical importance of conventional serum biomarkers in lung cancer.

Haruhiko Nakamura, Toshihide Nishimura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The value of serum TRAP1 in diagnosing small cell lung cancer and tumor immunity.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haruhiko NakamuraDepartment of Chest Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. h-nakamura@marianna-u.ac.jp.
Toshihide NishimuraDepartment of Translational Medicine Informatics, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum biomarkers provide valuable information about the diagnosis and prognosis of a wide variety of malignant tumors. Despite the identification of several useful serum biomarkers in lung cancer, consensus on their utility has not yet been reached. Furthermore, guidelines and standard protocols to implement their use for patients with lung cancer are lacking, despite the accumulation of much data on the efficacy of several serum biomarkers over recent decades. In this review, we discuss the molecular features, functions, and clinical relevance of the conventional serum biomarkers for lung cancer, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 (CYFRA 21-1), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), sialyl Lewis

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoid TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Squamous CellHumansKeratin-19Lung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsOligosaccharidesPeptide FragmentsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseRecombinant ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenKeratin-19OligosaccharidesPeptide FragmentsPhosphopyruvate Hydratasepro-gastrin-releasing peptide (31-98)Recombinant ProteinsSialyl Lewis X AntigenTissue Polypeptide AntigenCEACYFRA 21-1Lung cancerSerum biomarkerTumor marker

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.