ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- FDG-PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed paediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy and aspiration in pediatric neuroblastoma.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Article
- Comparing the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and bone marrow biopsy in newly diagnosed pediatric neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Utility ofThe Indian journal of medical research · 2021Article
- Review
- Nuclear Medicine Theranostics: Perspective from Pakistan.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether positron emission tomography/computed tomography using fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose (
methodsData were retrospectively analyzed for all cases of pHL between July 2010 and June 2015 referred for staging
resultsOf the 784 patients, 83.3% were male and 16.7% female, with age ranging from 2 to 18 years (mean 10.3 years). Among the total cases, 104 (13.3%) had BMI; of these, 100 were detected by PET imaging and 58 by BMB. BMB and
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.