Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28229083›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2017

What patients with pulmonary fibrosis and their partners think: a live, educative survey in the Netherlands and Germany.

Mirjam J G van Manen, Michael Kreuter, Bernt van den Blink, Ute Oltmanns, Karin Palmowski, Eva Brunnemer, Simone Hummler, Nelleke C Tak, Leon van den Toorn, Jelle Miedema and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The supportive care needs of people living with pulmonary fibrosis and their caregivers: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advance Care Planning Needs in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Qualitative Study.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mirjam J G van ManenDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Michael KreuterCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernt van den BlinkDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ute OltmannsCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin PalmowskiCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva BrunnemerCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simone HummlerCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nelleke C TakDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Leon van den ToornDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jelle MiedemaDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Henk C HoogstedenDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marlies S WijsenbeekDept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary fibrosis greatly impacts patients and their partners. Unmet needs of patients are increasingly acknowledged; the needs of partners often remain unnoticed. Little is known about the best way to educate patients and partners. We investigated pulmonary fibrosis patients' and partners' perspectives and preferences in care, and the differences in these between the Netherlands and Germany. Additionally, we evaluated whether interactive interviewing could be a novel education method in this population. Patients and partners were interviewed during pulmonary fibrosis patient information meetings. In the Netherlands, voting boxes were used and results were projected directly. In Germany, questionnaires were used. In the Netherlands, 278 patients and partners participated; in Germany, 51. Many participants experienced anxiety. Almost all experienced misunderstanding, because people do not know what pulmonary fibrosis is. All expressed a need for information, psychological support and care for partners. Use of the interactive voting system was found to be pleasant (70%) and informative (94%). This study improves the knowledge of care needs of patients with pulmonary fibrosis and their partners. There were no major differences between the Netherlands and Germany. Interactive interviewing could be an attractive method to acquire insights into the needs and preferences of patients and partners, while providing them with information at the same time.

Identifiers

PMID28229083
PMCPMC5308412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.