Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28229005›Full record

ArticleDisaster health

Emergency situations and deaf people in Israel: Communication obstacles and recommendations.

Carolina Tannenbaum-Baruchi, Paula Feder-Bubis, Bruria Adini, Limor Aharonson-Daniel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disaster health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Carolina Tannenbaum-BaruchiDepartment of Emergency Medicine; Recanati School for Community Health Professions; Faculty of Health; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel; PREPARED Center for Emergency Response Research; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Paula Feder-BubisPREPARED Center for Emergency Response Research; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel; Department of Health Systems Management; Faculty of Health Sciences & Faculty of Management; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Bruria AdiniDepartment of Emergency Medicine; Recanati School for Community Health Professions; Faculty of Health; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel; PREPARED Center for Emergency Response Research; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Limor Aharonson-DanielDepartment of Emergency Medicine; Recanati School for Community Health Professions; Faculty of Health; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel; PREPARED Center for Emergency Response Research; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILOffice of Readiness and Response · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The absence of the ability to hear sounds in deaf people is an obstacle to optimal communication in a predominantly hearing world. Emergency situations harbor sufficient challenge for the hearing person and pose even greater barriers for the deaf and hard of hearing. During disasters and emergency situations, deaf people have great difficulty in obtaining and sharing information, increasing their dependence on others. This article focuses on the experience of deaf people during a period of security threat, when missiles from the Gaza strip were aimed at the civilian population in Southern Israel, in 2009. The aim of this article is to illustrate the complexities that deaf citizens experienced, and describe their coping mechanisms. A qualitative study including 15 heterogeneous-background Deaf participants interviewed by a researcher that belongs to the deaf community using a multiple-method facilitated questionnaire. Data was analyzed using grounded theory methodology principles. Main categories that arose from data analysis were communication problems during emergencies, the pager as a questionable warning device about emergencies (due to timing and content/context issues of its use), and the implications of the location of deaf people at time of emergency. Various channels for conveying information should be examined and created in order to maximize the heterogeneous deaf community's ability to receive vital information during an emergency. Professional sign language interpreters are necessary during emergencies, helping to reduce both dependence on informal sources (such as family members, including minors, friends, neighbors, by-standers) and risk. The development of new technologies may bear potential help for deaf persons during emergencies. Being a socio-linguistic minority, it is recommended to ensure these technologies will be accessible to the whole deaf community.

Indexed as

communicationdeafemergencyrisk factorspecial needs community

Identifiers

PMID28229005
PMCPMC5314894
OpenAlexW2027683176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.