Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28228810›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2016

Detecting Diseases in Medical Prescriptions Using Data Mining Tools and Combining Techniques.

Mehdi Teimouri, Farshad Farzadfar, Mahsa Soudi Alamdari, Amir Hashemi-Meshkini, Parisa Adibi Alamdari, Ehsan Rezaei-Darzi, Mehdi Varmaghani, Aysan Zeynalabedini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehdi TeimouriDepartment of Network Science and Technology, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. ; Non-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farshad FarzadfarNon-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa Soudi AlamdariDepartment of Network Science and Technology, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. ; Non-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hashemi-MeshkiniNon-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ; Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa Adibi AlamdariSchool of medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan Rezaei-DarziNon-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi VarmaghaniNon-communicable disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Science Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ; Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aysan ZeynalabediniSchool of Medicine, Orumia University of Medical Sciences, Orumia, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data about the prevalence of communicable and non-communicable diseases, as one of the most important categories of epidemiological data, is used for interpreting health status of communities. This study aims to calculate the prevalence of outpatient diseases through the characterization of outpatient prescriptions. The data used in this study is collected from 1412 prescriptions for various types of diseases from which we have focused on the identification of ten diseases. In this study, data mining tools are used to identify diseases for which prescriptions are written. In order to evaluate the performances of these methods, we compare the results with Naïve method. Then, combining methods are used to improve the results. Results showed that Support Vector Machine, with an accuracy of 95.32%, shows better performance than the other methods. The result of Naive method, with an accuracy of 67.71%, is 20% worse than Nearest Neighbor method which has the lowest level of accuracy among the other classification algorithms. The results indicate that the implementation of data mining algorithms resulted in a good performance in characterization of outpatient diseases. These results can help to choose appropriate methods for the classification of prescriptions in larger scales.

Indexed as

Data Mining; VotingDiagnosisMedical PrescriptionOutpatient DiseasesStackingWeighted Voting

Identifiers

PMID28228810
PMCPMC5242358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.