Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28228565›Full record

ArticleNeurology2017

A dedicated scholarly research program in an adult and pediatric neurology residency program.

Matthew S Robbins, Sheryl R Haut, Richard B Lipton, Mark J Milstein, Lenore C Ocava, Karen Ballaban-Gil, Solomon L Moshé, Mark F Mehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew S RobbinsFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. marobbin@montefiore.org.
Sheryl R HautFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Richard B LiptonFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Mark J MilsteinFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Lenore C OcavaFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Karen Ballaban-GilFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Solomon L MoshéFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Mark F MehlerFrom the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe and assess the effectiveness of a formal scholarly activity program for a highly integrated adult and pediatric neurology residency program.

methodsStarting in 2011, all graduating residents were required to complete at least one form of scholarly activity broadly defined to include peer-reviewed publications or presentations at scientific meetings of formally mentored projects. The scholarly activity program was administered by the associate residency training director and included an expanded journal club, guided mentorship, a required grand rounds platform presentation, and annual awards for the most scholarly and seminal research findings. We compared scholarly output and mentorship for residents graduating within a 5-year period following program initiation (2011-2015) and during the preceding 5-year preprogram baseline period (2005-2009).

resultsParticipation in scholarship increased from the preprogram baseline (24 of 53 graduating residents, 45.3%) to the postprogram period (47 of 57 graduating residents, 82.1%,

conclusionsOur multifaceted program, designed to enhance resident and faculty engagement in scholarship, was associated with increased academic output and an expanded mentorship pool. The program was particularly effective at encouraging presentations at scientific meetings. Longitudinal analysis will determine whether such a program portfolio inspires an increase in academic careers involving neuroscience-oriented research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEducation, Medical, GraduateAnniversaries and Special EventsFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeurologyOutcome Assessment, Health CarePediatricsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28228565
PMCPMC5379930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.