Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28228394›Full record

ReviewClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2017

Update on Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccinology.

Luis M de la Maza, Guangming Zhong, Robert C Brunham

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of oralmSystems · 2025
    Article
  4. Profile ofHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Study Models forMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  7. A VCG-Based MultiepitopeBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. TheMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diverse animal models forFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis M de la MazaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA lmdelama@uci.edu.
Guangming ZhongDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Robert C BrunhamVaccine Research Laboratory, University of British Columbia Center for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Chlamydia Vaccine---Global search for chlamydial T cell antigens in HLA-DR4 transgenic miceR21AI105712 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ZHONG, GUANGMING · 2016 to 2017
$426k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI105712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attempts to produce a vaccine to protect against

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryHumansBacterial VaccinesadjuvantsantigensChlamydia muridarumChlamydia trachomatisChlamydia trachomatis vaccinesdelivery systemsroutes of immunizationvaccinology

Identifiers

PMID28228394
PMCPMC5382834
OpenAlexW2590164387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.