Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28228308›Full record

SynthesisIndian heart journal

Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis.

Sivakumar Ardhanari, Bharath Yarlagadda, Vishal Parikh, Kevin C Dellsperger, Anand Chockalingam, Sudarshan Balla, Senthil Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transthoracic Echocardiography: Beginner's Guide with Emphasis on Blind Spots as Identified with CT and MRI.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sivakumar ArdhanariDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Bharath YarlagaddaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Vishal ParikhDepartment of Cardiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Kevin C DellspergerDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University Health, Augusta, GA, United States.
Anand ChockalingamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Sudarshan BallaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Senthil KumarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States. Electronic address: kumarse@health.missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · USAugusta University Health · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be challenging. It can be nearly impossible to distinguish CP from other causes of right heart failure. Although various imaging modalities help in the diagnosis, no test is definitive. Several reviews have addressed the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP but a systematic review has not yet been published.

objectiveOur intention was to study the ability of various non-invasive imaging modalities to diagnose CP in patients with surgically confirmed disease and to apply our findings to develop a clinically useful diagnostic algorithm.

methodsA PubMed (NLM) search was performed with MeSH term "constrictive pericarditis". Original articles that investigated the ability of various cardiovascular imaging modalities to noninvasively diagnose surgically confirmed CP were included in our review. Investigations that included any cases without surgical confirmation were excluded.

resultsThe PubMed search yielded 3001 results with MeSH term "constrictive pericarditis" (January 8, 2016). We identified (40) studies on CP that matched our inclusion criteria. We summarized our results sorted by individual non-invasive CV imaging modalities - echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under each imaging modality, we grouped our discussion based on different parameters useful in CP diagnosis.

conclusionsIn conclusion, contemporary diagnosis of CP is based on clinical features and echocardiography. Cardiac MRI is recommended in patients where echocardiography is not diagnostic. Both cardiac MRI and CT can guide surgical planning but we prefer MRI as it provides both structural and functional information.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialEchocardiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePericarditis, ConstrictiveTomography, X-Ray ComputedCardiac computed tomographyCardiac magnetic resonance imagingCardiovascular imagingConstrictive pericarditisEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID28228308
PMCPMC5318986
OpenAlexW2460670766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.